|
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You have been told not to respond to my comments since all you do is post lies & unintelligent flippant responses. You are ignorant of Abiogenesis, formerly known as Spontaneous Generation, which is the clever deception by Thomas Huxley to help poor boy Darwin & his vacuous tautologies & lame stories that hand wave the falsifying evidence away. The so-called common ancestor of all at the root of the evolutionary tree of live is your supposed simple cell that popped into existence naturaly.duh
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wikdreans "u invoke God unnecessarily, & quote from any obsolete or untrustworthy sources that fits your argument, & nothing from a peer-reviewed, recognized scientific journal."Any evolutionary material from so-called scientists are meaningless, regardless of a peer review. Darwin's peers rejected Darwinism/Evil-ution.You are the one posting irrelevant material such as the Urey-Miller failed experiment, which was fraudulent and not naturalistic. You rant about old disproved icons of Evo.
Renfield37 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ive been nothing but correct, but all you had to do was admit your failure anyway
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
2 of 2It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Every notion behind Darwinism is an appeal to the mystical magical materialistic naturalism which is untestable.1 of 2Professor Richard Lewontin, a geneticist: We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. .
ultimatedude1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
1. abiogenesis has NOTHING to do with evolution, get that through your thick skull2. "micro" and "macro" evolution are made up terms by you creationists3. Go watch "10 questions every intelligent christian must answer" and argue with those guys.4. fuck off.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wildreams "i do undstand the theory of thermodynamics... This source is correct but it wrongly assumes the Earth is a close system, end of discussion,.."WRONG FOOL. It covers various open & closed systems. Therefore, you lied. You do not understand the SLoT, you did not read the material and you do not know what the issues of the SLoT are for abiogenesis & macro-evolution which NEVER happened. It does not help to resort to an open system unless you are design as plants are to use solar energy.
TheProf1988 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
'you just dont want to believe the bible or have anything to do with it and dont want anyone else to either'Wow, Renfield got something correct for once.
ebola23410 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Then enlighten me. How is it posssible that the Israelite population went from seventy (Ex.1:5) to several million (over 600,000 adult males) in just a few generations! (Numbers 1:45-46 ).
Renfield37 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
you just dont want to believe the bible or have anything to do with it and dont want anyone else to either, just because you have been told it is junk and by what you want to belive yourself, but just because you have talked about it dont mean your right. you and they the evolution people dont want any responsibilities in having to think if your right or wrong |
